The Fragile Surplus: Jakarta Braces for a Trade Shock as Mideast Tensions Threaten Energy Lifelines
Key Takeaways
|
JAKARTA, Investortrust.id — On paper, Indonesia’s trade engine is still humming. On Monday, the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) confirmed that the archipelago had extended its winning streak to 69 consecutive months of trade surpluses. But the $0.95 billion figure for January 2026—a 62% drop from the previous month—tells a story of a narrowing margin for error.
As geopolitical sparks in the Middle East threaten to ignite a regional conflagration, Jakarta is finding that its hard-won trade stability is increasingly hostage to events thousands of miles away. The strikes by the U.S. and Israel on Tehran, followed by Iranian threats to choke the Strait of Hormuz, have sent global oil prices northward from $60 to nearly $78 per barrel. For a net oil importer like Indonesia, this is not just a line item; it is a systemic threat.
Indonesia’s economic architecture is built on the assumption of manageable energy costs. As energy imports surged nearly 28% in early 2026 to $3.17 billion, the country’s trade "moat" is evaporating. If the Strait of Hormuz—the world’s most vital energy artery—is shuttered, the resulting spike in logistics and fuel costs could dismantle the manufacturing and export sectors that Indonesia has spent decades cultivating.
.
The Anatomy of a Shrinking Surplus
Ateng Hartono, Deputy for Distribution and Service Statistics at BPS, noted that while the overall surplus remains intact, the internal mechanics are shifting. The non-oil and gas sector provided a $3.22 billion surplus, buoyed by a 46% surge in vegetable oil and fat exports. However, this was nearly cannibalized by a $2.27 billion deficit in the energy sector.
"The surplus in January 2026 was largely supported by animal and vegetable fats, mineral fuels, and iron and steel," Ateng explained. Yet, the data revealed a concerning trend: while exports grew a modest 3.4% to $22.16 billion, imports ballooned by 18.2% to $21.2 billion. This "import fever" was driven by a 35% jump in capital goods—a sign of domestic industrial health that now risks being smothered by rising input costs.
The 'Hormuz' Headwind
The ghost in the machine for Indonesian planners is the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz. BPS data indicates that Indonesia’s trade with the trio of Oman, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is worth billions. In 2025 alone, non-oil imports from Oman reached $718.8 million, while the UAE accounted for $1.4 billion in trade, primarily in precious metals and aluminum.
"Hormuz is not just a shipping lane; it is a global energy checkpoint," says Fakhrul Fulvian, Chief Economist at Trimegah Sekuritas. Fakhrul warns that the market is currently pricing in a "risk premium" rather than just physical disruption. According to his models, every $10 increase in the price per barrel could shave $250 million off Indonesia’s trade surplus.
The impact would be felt at every level of the economy. Higher fuel costs translate into higher logistics costs, which inevitably push up the price of sembako—the nine essential food items that dictate the cost of living for 280 million people.
.
A Test of National Resilience
The National Economic Council (DEN) has attempted to project a calm exterior. Septian Hario Seto, a member of the council, suggested that the impact on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and the mineral sector (minerba) would remain "relatively limited." Nevertheless, he acknowledged that the uncertainty remains "quite high" and will depend heavily on the next week of geopolitical maneuvering.
For Trade Minister Budi Santoso, the priority is preventing a protracted conflict. While he noted that there has been no "direct impact" on export activity yet, he admitted that a prolonged spike in energy prices would pressure the competitiveness of Indonesian goods in the global market.
As Jakarta navigates this external shock, the consensus among economists is clear: the era of the "easy surplus" may be over. The true test of Indonesia’s resilience will not be the size of its trade balance today, but its capacity for energy diversification and fiscal hedging tomorrow.

